Fresh Technologies and Asylum Methods - Rossendale Harriers
25587
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-25587,single-format-standard,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,vertical_menu_enabled,side_area_uncovered_from_content,qode-theme-ver-16.8,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-7.6,vc_responsive

Fresh Technologies and Asylum Methods

Fresh Technologies and Asylum Methods

From dialect recognition software to corresponding tools, a number of new solutions are making their way in asylum procedures. While these digital solutions may expedite decision-making processes and give governments with accurate data, they also present new vulnerabilities for refugees and migrant populations. Many other things, these include potential ‘machine mistakes’ and improved surveillance ~ both of that could have harmful consequences for rights. This article highlights the advantages of new governance structures and legal frames that can regulate who is in charge of ensuring info security, accuracy and fair consequences.

Asylum methods are intricate, and for many people, the decision to allow or deny asylum can be quite a matter of existence or death. Yet when a person’s right to asylum should be protected under international law, the task itself quite often entails significant and painful delays which can have a poor impact on the mental health. In addition , migrant workers are forced to relive all their experiences of persecution and risk dehumanisation as they find their way a complex bureaucracy staffed simply by officials who all are not familiar with the difficulties of refugee rights.

Against this backdrop, various countries will be increasingly using technologies to reduces costs of asylum techniques. These vary from read review dialog and dialect recognition program to help asile submit their very own applications, iris scanning technology that can determine a refugee’s place of foundation, and methods that meet migrants with communities in resettlement countries. In the case of these apps, they are usually accompanied by a sponsor of naturally routine technical issues that could possibly be considered insignificant in a consumer context yet can include far more significant implications just for migrants’ privileges.

Steve Duxbury
stevedux@btinternet.com
No Comments

Post A Comment